Toughest Venues: #1 Ohio Stadium

Ohio Stadium or more affectionately referred to as ‘The Horseshoe’ for its distinctive horseshoe configuration, takes the top spot on our list. There is no tougher venue in the Big Ten conference than the Shoe. If you play the Buckeyes at the Horseshoe, all bets are on a loss. If the crowd noise doesn’t affect your team, then the competitive Buckeye squads will.
ATTENDANCE: 9
| Ohio Stadium (Capacity: 102,329) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Home Games | Overall attendance | Avg. attendance/ game | |
| 2007 | 7 | 735,773 | 105,110 |
| 2006 | 7 | 735,679 | 105,096 |
| 2005 | 7 | 735,120 | 105,017 |
| 2004 | 6 | 629,257 | 104,876 |
| 2003 | 8 | 838,963 | 104,870 |
When you win 32 games out of the 35 played in the last 5 seasons, including 3 national title runs in the last 3 seasons, it is hard to find an empty seat in the house. That’s actually saying a lot considering the Shoe is the fourth largest collegiate stadium in the nation with an official capacity of 102,329 which has been shattered each of the past 5 seasons.
Now imagine this colossal monument to college football filled to the brim with scarlet clad Buckeye fans. The mere idea can send shivers down your back if you’re the visiting team.
TRADITION/HISTORY: 9
Before we start screaming about how Ohio State has far more tradition/history than Penn State and Michigan, which were both awarded higher marks than the Shoe, let us remember that ranking these three programs in this category was almost like pulling teeth. We are talking about a combined 20 national titles, 11 Heisman winners, and a 64-52 post season record.

Do we rank it based on the number of championship trophies? Michigan dominates in this category with 11, but, even Yale claims as many as 24 national titles, its last one coming in 1924, and they certainly do not compare tradition or history wise to any of the 3 programs.
Do we base it off of Heisman winners? Ohio State with 7 (2 by Archie Griffin) would win this. Even Army claims 3 Heisman titles, equivalent to the tradition rich program of Michigan and 2 more winners than Penn State, but are they richer in tradition or history? We don’t believe so.
Or do we consider post-season play the deciding variable, when these teams are matched up against teams from other conferences that have proven their competitiveness throughout the regular season. Penn State blows everyone away in this category being the only program out of the three with a winning record in the post-season. Winning 71% of its post-season games.
So its not exactly a clear-cut, ‘Ohio State has more national titles, they should therefore be the winners in this category’ situation. We took all 3 into consideration, but the deciding variable was the program’s influence on the landscape of college football.
Michigan is so steeped in tradition and history, there was no doubt they stood atop this category. The all time winningest program in college football, the highest winning percentage in college football, the winged helmets, the Go Blue banner, the Victors fight song, the list is just endless.
Then it was a two horse race between the Nittany Lions and Buckeyes. On one hand you have the Buckeyes, the much more accomplished program on the field, but eventually the Nittany Lions have had a much greater impact on the sport of college football than any which edged the Buckeyes into third place.
Let us explain. The 1987 Fiesta Bowl between Penn State and Miami was much greater than a single post-season bowl game. The game was so successful and so influential, it served as the catalyst for the thinking heads of college football to want to create a system to pair the top two teams at the end of the regular season no matter what conference they were from. Prior to that game, the top teams from each conference were locked into their respective Rose, Cotton, Orange and Sugar Bowls no matter their rank at the end of the season. If there was the rare #1 v #2 matchup during this time, it was by pure coincidence and never deliberate. The Fiesta Bowl showed it could actually be done, and that the top two teams, no matter which conferences they were from, should be paired together in a post season bowl. And thus the Bowl Alliance was born.
Then came Penn State’s momentous decision to shed their independent status and join the Big Ten. Not only did this shock the collegiate football world when the long time independent power from the Northeast joined one of the oldest and most tradition rich conferences in the country, but it sparked a realignment movement that transcended over 4 major conferences eventually resulting in the teams and conferences we see today.
So it was a tough decision, but a justified one in awarding Penn State the second spot in this category. Their mark on college football is as undeniable as Notre Dame’s decision to pair with NBC for its own television contract. So with that explained, we bring you the Ohio State Buckeyes.
You cannot walk into Ohio Stadium and ignore the tradition. The ‘Best Damn Band in the Land’, the dotting of the i, and Script Ohio all happens before the the ball is even touched. Then theres the Buckeye stickers, the Block O and the chilling ‘O-H, I-O’ chant. Ohio State can easily top this category, but as we explained earlier, by default of Michigan and Penn State, Ohio State gets a 9 in this category.
FANS: 9
How can you not take advantage of the rabid student base at Ohio State? Granted the rest of the Shoe is filled with equally rabid alumni fans, but Ohio State continues to disperse its students around the stadium rather than embracing the ‘student section’ that many stadiums have come to appreciate as an asset to creating a home field environment.
Sure theres the ‘Block O’ section which is just as loud if not more organized than any student section you can find in the country. But with only 1,200 tickets available for the Block O, it pales in comparison to the sight of 20,000 plus students standing together at Beaver or Michigan Stadium. The students at Ohio State know this all too well, with numerous calls for a student section. Unfortunately they have mostly fallen on deaf ears with the administration which cites the loss of revenue generated by the current tickets for higher paying alumni if those seats were to be given away to students to form a student section.
Maybe it is for the best. Even without a one true student section, Buckeye students aren’t known for their welcoming behavior. Their tendencies of berating and harassing their opponents is both notorious and well documented. Unfortunately, it is also a tendency many student sections around the Big Ten have begun to imitate.
VENUE: 11
One of the most recognizable venues, not only in collegiate football, but in all sports, the horseshoe shaped Ohio Stadium is an icon in the sporting world.
By dispersing the students into the rest of the stadium, the source of noise in the venue is not isolated to a specific student section like in most places, but the entire venue is deafening when the crowd gets into it after a big play. Add to the fact that the horseshoe has been enclosed, noise has no where else to go but on the field.

The only drawback to the historic Horseshoe is the lack of permanent field lights. Like Michigan, Ohio Stadium does not feel it is necessary to add lights as a permanent fixture. When night events do occur like Texas in 2005, and Michigan in 2006, temporary lights are installed to fulfill the need.
WIN/LOSS RECORD: 11
| Home | Away | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | L | W vs ranked | L vs ranked | W | L | W vs ranked | L vs ranked | |
| 2007 | 6 | 1 | #21 Wisconsin | - | 5 | 0 | #23 Purdue #25 Penn St #21 Michigan |
- |
| 2006 | 7 | 0 | #24 Penn St #2 Michigan |
- | 5 | 0 | #2 Texas #13 Iowa |
- |
| 2005 | 6 | 1 | #21 Iowa #16 Michigan St #25 Northwestern |
#2 Texas | 3 | 1 | #17 Michigan | #16 Penn St |
| 2004 | 5 | 1 | #7 Michigan | #16 Wisconsin | 4 | 3 | - | - |
| 2003 | 8 | 0 | #12 Iowa #13 Purdue |
- | 0 | 2 | - | #4 Michigan |
| overall | 32 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 17 | 6 | 6 | 2 |
This category ultimately put Ohio Stadium over the top. It might not share the same fan experience as Wisconsin’s Camp Randall, or as intimidating or deafening as Beaver Stadium, but no one, absolutely no one, wants to play the Buckeyes at the Shoe.

Reason? 3 losses in the last 5 years. Thats 3 losses in the last 35 games played at the Horseshoe. A stunning 91% winning percentage at home. And the last 3 teams to win at the Shoe were #16 Wisconsin, #2 Texas and Illinois. The 2004 Wisconsin team eventually went undefeated in their first 9 games, losing only their last 2 away games, that 2005 Texas team eventually went on to beat the USC Trojans that year for the national title, and that 2007 Illinois team ended up earning a BCS Rose Bowl invitation. A stunning resume for Ohio Stadium in the last half-decade.
In the last 5 years, 11 ranked teams have reluctantly scheduled themselves into Ohio Stadium, and 9 of them have returned home losers to the Buckeyes. 7 different teams of those 9 fell victim to the Shoe, Michigan lost twice and so did Iowa.
If the crowd wasn’t a factor in itself, the Buckeyes continue to field highly successful and competitive squads. When they lose star players to the pros, the Buckeyes simply reload for another run at the title. Rebuild is simply not in their repertoire. Proof lies in the 3 back to back national championship appearances in the last 3 years.
Unfortunately the cutoff point was in 2003, but as recently as 2002, the Buckeyes made yet another national title appearance in which they won an epic overtime battle against Miami for a national championship. That would have made it 4 title appearances in 6 seasons. Teams would die for just 1 regular BCS bowl invite in that amount of time.
So not only are you playing in the toughest home field environment in the Big Ten, but you are faced with a home squad that are annual title contenders. It is no wonder wins at the Shoe just don’t happen. Come to think of it, they should be awarding trophies to teams that win their individual away games at Ohio Stadium.
TOTAL: 49 OUT OF POSSIBLE 55
Have you attended a game at Ohio Stadium? Let us know how your experience went. Your memories of the venue might differ greatly from our perspective and we would like to know.
Releated Posts:
- Great Moments in the Penn State/Ohio State Rivalry, Part 2
- Starting Ohio State Week Off Right
- Penn State takes a lickin’ but stops tickin’ against Ohio State
- Let’s Get it Started – Ohio State
- Behind Enemy Lines: The Ohio State Buckeyes








It’s always good to read kind words about the Shoe, especially coming from a non-Buckeye. That said, I still think Camp Randall is the Big Ten’s version of hell on earth. The Badgers seem to play disproportionately better at home than they do on the road whereas the Bucks (and the Lions in a great year) can beat anyone anywhere.
I was in Block O way back when and I still think students lose sight of the benefit of not having a “student section”. Basically: there’s nowhere to hide in Ohio Stadium. The south end (where Block O is) is hostile. The north end (where most of the upperclassmen and fraternity/sorority blocks tend to cluster) is just as hostile. The alumni that tend to flank on the west and east ends are just as hostile. I like it that way.
You noted the rotunda, but notice the maize and blue flowers. Those came as a result of a lost wager of the 1922 Michigan game. Michigan won, and so we’re stuck with that. Oh, and the stadium was modeled after Harvard Stadium. Not coincidentally, perhaps, the Big House was modeled after the Yale Bowl.
I like the list, but just thought I’d let you know that it’s only been 2 national championship games in a row, not 3.
Nice work on the series. Really enjoyed it.
I am a Penn State alum but I can’t see any way that someone could say that PSU’s tradition is greater than tOSU’s
I’m an OSU supporter and must thank your site for the kind words..
Thanks you all for those kind words,
.
But to address Angry Mike’s comment. We tried our best to explain the ridiculous task in ranking Penn State, Ohio State and Michigan in the tradition/history category. But eventually came to the conclusion that Penn State’s impact on college football was far greater than Ohio State’s. The Buckeyes has always been and will always be part of Big Ten lore, but they impact little else outside of the conference other than their post season matchups.
.
Penn State on the other hand has had far greater impact both on the direction of the collegiate post season as well as the members in the different conferences we see today simply because the Nittany Lions stunned the rest of the country by joining the Big Ten. As an independent for so long, they have impacted football powerhouses not only in one conference, but across the entire landscape of college football.
.
For that we awarded Penn State the second spot in the category.
there are two places in the big ten i’ve been hesitant to visit, that is the horseshoe and the big(shit)house. i fear going to ohio because i’d probably get my ass rolled after shooting it off so often (thats my dose of respect to Ohio) and ive avoided Michigan Stadium because i’ve heard its hell to endure such an antiquated stadium. thanks for the overview, it was awesome and fun
thats great about the tradition and fans in the stands, awesome, but just curious as to why some fans dont point to their team out of stands and on the field. is that the team is not as good in years past, becuase to me the game is played on the field,
tradition is great
but really interesting when its greater than the current team
and a visitor can win in the horseshoe
when simply they have a better team
take the crowd out of it by doing things they dont expect
there it goes
and two
the past isnt the present
ohio state is good
fine
but relying way too much on traditions and fan noise
indicates to me that the team isnt good or as good
and is osu really good
again
barring fan noise and tradition
team to team
if osu is good
poeple outside columbus will talk about the team
and the others as a bonus and an addition
osu has great tradition
my hypothesis is this
when one talks of crowd and tradition
thats overcompensating for the product on the field and deflecting focus on the team
as the crowd or traidition
the crowd does factor in sure
but deciding the scores of ballgames
i could be wrong
but common sense says no!!!!
thats great about the tradition and fans in the stands, awesome, but just curious as to why some fans dont point to their team out of stands and on the field. is that the team is not as good in years past, becuase to me the game is played on the field,
tradition is great
but really interesting when its greater than the current team
and a visitor can win in the horseshoe
when simply they have a better team
take the crowd out of it by doing things they dont expect
there it goes
and two
the past isnt the present
ohio state is good
fine
but relying way too much on traditions and fan noise
indicates to me that the team isnt good or as good
and is osu really good
again
barring fan noise and tradition
team to team
if osu is good
poeple outside columbus will talk about the team
and the others as a bonus and an addition
osu has great tradition
my hypothesis is this
when one talks of crowd and tradition
thats overcompensating for the product on the field and deflecting focus on the team
as the crowd or traidition
the crowd does factor in sure
but deciding the scores of ballgames
i could be wrong
but common sense says no!!!!