<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Championship Week Blogpolling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nittanywhiteout.com/2009/12/02/championship-week-blogpolling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2009/12/02/championship-week-blogpolling/</link>
	<description>Penn State Nittany Lion Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Power Index</title>
		<link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2009/12/02/championship-week-blogpolling/comment-page-1/#comment-3053</link>
		<dc:creator>Power Index</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nittanywhiteout.com/?p=5378#comment-3053</guid>
		<description>To those voters who like to claim they are adhering to &quot;head to head&quot; matchups. It is not ridiculous to rank a team that has struggled down the stretch below one that has continued to play consistently. Iowa has lost 2 of their last 3 and looked inept in their final game against Minnesota. I know they beat Penn State head to head, but in college football where transitive properties do not apply, when do you toss out head to head (early on in the season) and go with each team&#039;s recent performance instead? Stewart Mandel&#039;s Power Rankings does exactly this and I don&#039;t understand why most voters don&#039;t follow suit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those voters who like to claim they are adhering to &#8220;head to head&#8221; matchups. It is not ridiculous to rank a team that has struggled down the stretch below one that has continued to play consistently. Iowa has lost 2 of their last 3 and looked inept in their final game against Minnesota. I know they beat Penn State head to head, but in college football where transitive properties do not apply, when do you toss out head to head (early on in the season) and go with each team&#39;s recent performance instead? Stewart Mandel&#39;s Power Rankings does exactly this and I don&#39;t understand why most voters don&#39;t follow suit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Power Index</title>
		<link>http://nittanywhiteout.com/2009/12/02/championship-week-blogpolling/comment-page-1/#comment-2814</link>
		<dc:creator>Power Index</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nittanywhiteout.com/?p=5378#comment-2814</guid>
		<description>To those voters who like to claim they are adhering to &quot;head to head&quot; matchups. It is not ridiculous to rank a team that has struggled down the stretch below one that has continued to play consistently. Iowa has lost 2 of their last 3 and looked inept in their final game against Minnesota. I know they beat Penn State head to head, but in college football where transitive properties do not apply, when do you toss out head to head (early on in the season) and go with each team&#039;s recent performance instead? Stewart Mandel&#039;s Power Rankings does exactly this and I don&#039;t understand why most voters don&#039;t follow suit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those voters who like to claim they are adhering to &#8220;head to head&#8221; matchups. It is not ridiculous to rank a team that has struggled down the stretch below one that has continued to play consistently. Iowa has lost 2 of their last 3 and looked inept in their final game against Minnesota. I know they beat Penn State head to head, but in college football where transitive properties do not apply, when do you toss out head to head (early on in the season) and go with each team&#39;s recent performance instead? Stewart Mandel&#39;s Power Rankings does exactly this and I don&#39;t understand why most voters don&#39;t follow suit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
