Everyone Was Wrong: Iowa to the Orange?
No, it doesn’t affect Penn State, but it seems that the Fiesta Bowl desperately hates itself, and will select TCU and Boise State to play in the 2010 Fiesta Bowl. That’s right, they’ll get a rematch of last year’s San Diego Credit Union Poinsettia Bowl, which last year drew a huge [sarcasm] TV audience: the 15th highest ratings of all bowl games and a massive 3.70 Nielsen rating. That wasn’t even close to last year’s Alamo Bowl, which pitted Missouri and Northwestern. So, um, no idea what’s going on there. Furthermore, only about 35,000 were in attendance–does the Fiesta Bowl really think they’ll fill up the stadium with two mid-major teams?
But, even though we’ve got over an hour before that’s officially announced, it has been declared as such across the internet. CBS11 in Dallas is calling it–by far the most official entity to do so, joined by a New York Times blog, and so too is BHGP, citing the Tampa Chapter of the I-Club (Iowa’s version of the Nittany Lion club) and it seems like this morning’s hot rumors will be correct.
Now, I hate buying in to the rumor cycle, especially considering that they’ve been wavering back and forth, but I just want to let you, the reader, know, that I have absolutely no idea a) what’s going on and b) why the Fiesta Bowl would do something like this? It will inevitably set up a Georgia Tech-Iowa matchup in the Orange Bowl and a Florida-Cincinnati showdown in the Sugar, and sure, both are intriguing matchups, but does the Fiesta really think they’ll get a full house with TCU/Boise? What about the TV ratings, for that matter? And if I’m on either one of those teams, or a fan, I’m royally pissed. For TCU to take on a Georgia Tech or an Iowa or a Florida is a chance to say look, we’re right up there with big-time, big-conference teams, and that’s why Utah gets so much credit for last year’s beatdown of Alabama. If TCU beats up on Boise, what do they win? They would have a victory over an “overrated” Boise State team, and will never get to show that they were championship game material. Even if Boise were to defeat TCU, the loser will inevitably be labeled a fraud, and the winner will get nothing out of it.
I hope this chatter is just that, but if the Fiesta has created this matchup, not only have they done a disservice to themselves, but to two quality football teams as well.
And to tie Penn State in here: I’m a little shocked that the Orange Bowl would select Iowa over Penn State. I thought the generally accepted theory was that if it was up to the Fiesta, it would be Iowa, and Penn State would be favored by the Orange Bowl, but it now seems like Iowa was always the first choice of both bowls. Nobody’s talking about Penn State to anything but the Capital One–and I’m absolutely fine with that, but after Penn State’s showing in 2006, I’m absolutely shocked that the Orange would avoid bringing the Lions back there. I’d have liked to get a shot at Georgia Tech and the triple option, but I’m not shedding a tear over this one.
Releated Posts:
- Explaining the BCS or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Orange Bowl
- NCIS and The Biggest Loser beats out the Orange Bowl
- If you don’t like ratings, money or fans, pick IOWA
- FedEx drops Orange Bowl sponsorship admist declining attendance, ticket sales and ratings
- Regret Passing Up on Penn State Yet?








The BCS Bowls are protecting themselves by setting up a TCU/Boise Match. Its true that nobody wants this matchup, including the teams themselves. So why do they do it? Because if TCU beat a BCS conference team it puts more pressure for the BCS to A) Include more teams and B) move to a playoff system. By making all the non AQ teams play each other, they are protecting their monopoly on college football.
I know it sounds like a conspiracy, but its the best explanation I can come up with.
I agree that was the case, but looking at the matchups, the only way TCU or Boise State can get a fair matchup was to be matched up with Cinncy because record wise they are all undefeated and at the end of the day isn't that what they are claiming to be the reason why they are the best in the country? So by their logic, playing another undefeated team (TCU in this case) should be the best matchup for them.
I was really shocked by the Fiesta Bowl decision. I do agree with the Orange Bowl decision of Iowa over Penn State, but I wish Penn State and all Big Ten schools the best of luck in the upcoming bowls. There is no classier person in college sports than Joe Pa.
The BCS Bowls are protecting themselves by setting up a TCU/Boise Match. Its true that nobody wants this matchup, including the teams themselves. So why do they do it? Because if TCU beat a BCS conference team it puts more pressure for the BCS to A) Include more teams and B) move to a playoff system. By making all the non AQ teams play each other, they are protecting their monopoly on college football.
I know it sounds like a conspiracy, but its the best explanation I can come up with.
I agree that was the case, but looking at the matchups, the only way TCU or Boise State can get a fair matchup was to be matched up with Cinncy because record wise they are all undefeated and at the end of the day isn't that what they are claiming to be the reason why they are the best in the country? So by their logic, playing another undefeated team (TCU in this case) should be the best matchup for them.
I was really shocked by the Fiesta Bowl decision. I do agree with the Orange Bowl decision of Iowa over Penn State, but I wish Penn State and all Big Ten schools the best of luck in the upcoming bowls. There is no classier person in college sports than Joe Pa.